For the Norne case we only need to support MULTFLT in the GRID section, and it 
seems supporting using it in SCEDULE is a different ball game, while in EDIT I 
assume it still can be supported within the parser. Personlally, I am not sure 
how uncommon it is to use MULTFLT outside of the GRID section, but my guess is 
that it is rather uncommon. Hence I suggest we only support MULTFLT when found 
in GRID for now (in the simulator at least).

Cheers,
Alf

________________________________________
From: Opm [opm-boun...@opm-project.org] on behalf of Atgeirr Rasmussen 
[atgeirr.rasmus...@sintef.no]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:54 PM
To: opm@opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [OPM] Regarding transmissibility multipliers

17. juni 2014 kl. 18:21 skrev Bård Skaflestad <bard.skafles...@sintef.no>:

> I don't think we'll be able to get away with a connection-based data
> structure for multipliers.  I really do think we need to preserve the
> per-cell nature of the multiplier arrays (and, generally, to store six
> values per cell).

I also think this is true. At least (I now believe), MLTFLT (at least when used 
in the GRID section),
can be supported within the framework of the MULTX/MULTX- etc., since it only 
modifies those values.
That means that we do not need any special treatment of FAULTS beyond the 
parser, since it can
internalise these multipliers, and the downstream code need only look at the 
(ijk) tuples of each face's
neighbour cells to determine the correct multipliers.

Atgeirr


_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you

_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm

Reply via email to