It doesn't matter to me. The issue is making sure the info is up to date, especially if calendar invites are used. Also, I really wish we could discuss stuff via email or discussion forum first. My preference has and continues to be for Discourse. But I think we are trying to have too complex of discussions in too short of a period. Or we make great progress, but we have to do it again because a key person was not on the call. I wish we'd move up to the 21st century a bit 😉. And no, I'm not gonna use bot to monitor irc.
Best, Ash Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 2, 2016, at 10:33, Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > All, > > Another follow-up from the TSC... > > Over the past couple of years, we've had discussions on whether meetings like > TSC or Release call times should be based on Pacific Time (as has been the > tradition since OPNFV started) or if the community should move to UTC. > > UTC obviously has the benefit of not changing with Daylight Savings/Summer > time switches twice a year in North America/Europe. When we last had the > discussion, a large number of people preferred staying with Pacific Time as > most of their work meetings (esp. outside of OPNFV) are based on their local > timezones and not UTC. > > If we're to move to UTC here's how the meeting times will change for the TSC > call in Pacific and Central European Timezones. > > Standard Time (now) > PT: 07:00 > CET: 16:00 > UTC: 15:00 > China: 23:00 > Daylight Savings/Summer Time (March-November in 2017) > PT: 08:00 > CET: 17:00 > UTC: 15:00 > China: 23:00 > Can you reply to the email with your comments/preference on UTC. vs Pacific > Time? > > Thanks, > > Ray > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
