+1, security is very important.

hongbo

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Dave Neary
发送时间: 2017年6月21日 11:03
收件人: Raymond Paik; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
抄送: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] TSC vote requested for security fix

+1 to fixing security issues. I have no preference on times.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 06/21/2017 07:07 AM, Raymond Paik wrote:
> OPNFV TSC Members:
> 
> Sorry for the short notice, but earlier today the Linux Foundation IT 
> team has been made aware of a high priority security issue (see 
> https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/stackguard) and 
> need to apply package errata and perform systems reboot as soon as 
> possible.  We tentatively scheduled 1-hour window on June 24th @01:00 
> -
> 02:00 UTC for this work, but if the TSC agrees, we'd like fix this sooner.  
> 
> I realize the timing is not ideal as people are working on Danube 3.0, 
> but two options I'd like to propose are 22:00 - 23:00 UTC on June 21st 
> or June 22nd.
> 
> Could I ask the TSC members to send your votes on the following as 
> soon as possible?
> 
>   * Do you approve an earlier security fix window? (Y/N)
>   * If you answered Y above, are you OK with June 21st, June 22nd, or
>     are you OK with either?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tsc mailing list
> opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tsc
> 

--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to