All,

This is for the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday.

As was discussed previously
<http://meetbot.opnfv.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2018/opnfv-meeting.2018-01-25-14.01.html>,
there was a consensus to look at a "union of contributions" across various
tools in OPNFV including Git, Gerrit, JIRA, and Confluence.  For example,
we talked about people making a total of 50 or 100 contributions across all
tools over a 12 month period as the constituent for the TSC election.

In the attached, you'll see the data point across the 4 tools in 2017.  In
the last tab, you'll also find a comparison of "top 50 contributors" across
the tools.  Although there are some exceptions, you'll see that active
contributors are active across all 4 tools.  One of the concerns was that
we want to be inclusive to recognize non-code contributions and you'll see
a high number of non-code contributors in both Gerrit and Jira.

In terms of a threshold, 100 annual contributions seems like a good
starting point.  As a point of reference, the following shows the number of
people that made 100 or more contributions in each tool.  (Based on this,
we'll have a minimum of 112 people eligible for the TSC election as we have
112 people that made 100 or more contributions to Gerrit alone)

   - Gerrit: 112
   - Git: 30
   - JIRA: 36
   - Wiki: 4

If we go to 50 annual contributions, I don't necessarily think there'll be
a significant increase in the pool and following is the breakdown.

   - Gerrit: 137
   - Git: 51
   - JIRA: 62
   - Wiki: 8

Please feel free to reply with any thoughts or feedback.  This will be
discussed further during the TSC call.

Thanks,

Ray

Attachment: 2017 active contributors v3.xlsx
Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to