Hi David,
As discussed in the previous Email, I have create a first version of scenario
results table(we can call it gating reporting ☺), see:
http://116.66.187.136:9998/index.html
Patch see:
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/56179/
For now, I have added four filters:
1. Scenario
2. Version
3. Installer
4. Iteration(we will query the last 10 days data, the default iteration
is 10, if all record is more than 10, it will only 10 record)
For now, we still have some problems to solve:
1. build_id(Jenkins id), we don’t have a unified ID to mark the whole
Jenkins jobs(deployment + functest + yardstick), for now, I use the
build_tag(e.g. jenkins-functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master-131, the
project:functest and installer:fuel are in build_tag) to index, so we can only
show the functest result.
2. Jenkins job results, depend on build_id, we can’t show all
results(deployment + functest + yardstick, only functest for now). And each
projects need to upload their results(UNTRIGGERED, PASS, FAIL).
3. Deployment results, for now, only daisy upload its deployment result,
we need ask each installer to upload deployment results, only build_id ready,
we can show all results.
4. Statistic results, depend on projects upload their results
It is the first version, we will add more functions step by step after the
above issue solved.
@All, if you have any suggestions, please let me know.
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: chenjiankun
发送时间: 2018年1月22日 17:02
收件人: 'David McBride'
抄送: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; [email protected]; Brattain, Ross B; Rao, Sridhar;
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN; [email protected]; Yuyang (Gabriel); ALFRED C
'MORTON ' ([email protected]); [email protected]; Liyin (Ace); Wangwulin
(Linda); [email protected]; Serena Feng; Julien
主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss][test-wg]Requirements for test resources collection
Thanks, David.
According your descriptions, I have created a demo table as below(wish I do not
misunderstanding your meaning):
scenario
date
Jenkins
Version
Installer
Deployment
Functest
yardstick
os-nosdn-nofeature-ha
2018-01-21
Jenkins id
euphrates
compass
pass
pass
pass
2018-01-21
Jenkins id
euphrates
compass
fail
not trigger
not trigger
statistic
8/9/10
(pass:8,triggered:9, total:10)
6/7/8
6/7/8
This last line in table body is the statistics information, and lines above are
the detailed information(and it can be folded).
The score 8/9/10 is pass/triggered/total. Total means should run, triggered
means actually run.
Also we can add three filters:
If you select installer as compass, then will show all data related to compass.
Iterations means last x data points to be displayed.
Does this table satisfied your requirements?
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: David McBride [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2018年1月20日 3:07
收件人: chenjiankun
抄送: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Brattain,
Ross B; Rao, Sridhar; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Yuyang (Gabriel); ALFRED C
'MORTON ' ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>);
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Liyin (Ace); Wangwulin
(Linda); [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Serena Feng;
Julien
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][test-wg]Requirements for test resources collection
+Serena, Julien
Thanks, Jack.
1. Data reported per scenario (i.e., jenkins job, deployment, functest,
yardstick, etc. displayed together for each scenario) instead of separate test
silos.
2. Include deployment results
3. Include all Jenkins job results (failure to start, failure to complete,
etc.)
4. Clear date/time stamps for every data point
5. Display the data above for the last x data points (e.g., 4, 5, 10 ?)
6. Use an easy-to-understand, unified scoring method for all test frameworks.
As I mentioned, yesterday, Julien and Serena have been working on this, as
well. Julien has developed a macro<https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/48515/>
to enable consolidation of all results per scenario. He is intending to use the
Daisy installer as a platform to verify the macro, which then can be adapted to
other installers.
In addition, Serena has agreed to help manage an intern who can assist with the
project. I have an action to create an intern proposal for that purpose.
David
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:23 AM, chenjiankun
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
As we discussed last test working group weekly meeting, we want to do test
resources aggregation.
We plan to offer a new friendly web portal which contain all existing test
resource and more functions.
I have a broad classification as bellow:
1. Data analysis
a) Reporting(existing, For release)
b) Bitergia(existing)
c) Grafana(existing, For detailed test results)
d) ……(maybe we can develop more tools to show our detailed test results)
2. Test working group information(What information you want to see from
test working group? Test working group event? Event of each project?)
3. Tools of each project(Need each project member to complete)
4. ……(waiting for you to improve)
This email is aim at collecting requirements for test resources, so if you have
any idea about classification, existing tools(such as reporting), new functions
you want, please do not hesitate to comment here.
As Gabriel said, he will create a new wiki page for test resources collection,
so you can also comment there.
@David, @Tim, can you repeat your advice about reporting here? I will try my
best to implement it.
@All, all requirements, advice, comment are welcome~☺
BRs,
Jack Chan
--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018<tel:%2B1.805.276.8018>
Email/Google Talk:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
