Hi, I'm preparing the branches for the two releases: 1.8.6 and 1.9.0 (due to the Java version change).
Regards JB On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:44:00 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com wrote: > > Hi JB, > > Do we have any instructions in the OPS4j community so I can perform the > release myself? We really need the 1.8.6 release ASAP! > > Thank you. > > On Monday, 20 June 2016 19:10:19 UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> Hey, any updates on this? >> >> On 6 June 2016 at 17:18, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Even better! >>> >>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <ra...@evosent.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are now >>>> fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, 6 June 2016 19:41:06 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Agree, even if I don't like that much, it makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:36:51 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So should we stick with Logback 1.1.2 and Log4j 2.3 for the 1.8.x >>>>>> release? That makes the most sense. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 13:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jeanbapti...@gmail.com >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I'm busy with Karaf 3.0.7 (and other Karaf >>>>>>> subprojects) release preparation. I will tackle pax-logging just after. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:29:56 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, it turns out that the upgrade from Logback 1.1.2 => 1.1.7 was >>>>>>>> not as easy as I expected. In between, the developers at Logback >>>>>>>> introduced >>>>>>>> dependencies on these additional >>>>>>>> packages: org.slf4j.event, org.codehaus.groovy.transform. Obviously >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Groovy one can be marked as optional; I'm checking the upstream source >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> understand when and how o.slf4j.event is used. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:14:26 UTC+1, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd prefer to downgrade to 2.3 in 1.8.6, then by the time we get >>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, log4j 2.6.1 should be released. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Basically, we want to avoid to break backward compability on >>>>>>>>>> minor version. It's unfortunately what we did in 1.8.6. >>>>>>>>>> So, we have to: >>>>>>>>>> 1. Or downgrade to log4j 2.3 to still support Java 6 >>>>>>>>>> 2. Or remove log4j 2 support in pax-logging 1.8.x, and create new >>>>>>>>>> major branch 1.9 with log4j 2 support. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:43:05 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wait, do you want Java 6 or 7 compatibility in 1.8.6? If it's 6, >>>>>>>>>>> we can downgrade log4j to 2.3. If it's 7, then it can be the latest >>>>>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 23:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose is: >>>>>>>>>>>> - remove log4j2 support in pax-logging 1.8.6 and go back to >>>>>>>>>>>> Java7 compatibility >>>>>>>>>>>> - release pax-logging 1.9.0 with log4j2 and Java8 only compliant >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:28:40 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for upgrading log4j to 2.6. Should get it all done in a >>>>>>>>>>>>> single release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 12:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it's on my TODO for next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:00:30 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra...@evosent.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey awesome people, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upgraded Logback from 1.1.2 to 1.1.7 in master. Would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it be possible to make a release of pax-logging 1.8.6? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Raúl. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> ------------------ >>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
