Yes, it's exactly the plan. Regards JB
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:28:27 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: > > We'll be releasing Log4j 2.7 sometime soon, so 1.9.0 can at least wait > until that's released anyways. 1.8.x should use 2.3 as it's the last > version that supports Java 6. > > On 6 September 2016 at 09:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jeanbapti...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). >> >> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:18:32 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >>> I thought the problem was that it required Java 7, not 8. None of the >>> pax-logging dependencies require Java 8. >>> >>> On 6 September 2016 at 09:16, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> We discussed while ago to a Java version change we did on Pax Logging >>>> 1.8.x: this version requires Java8 whereas it was supposed to work with >>>> Java6 as well. >>>> >>>> So, what I propose is to release 1.8.6 asap and prepare the rollback of >>>> Java8 requirement. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 3:31:00 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As far as I can see, releasing 1.8.6 can be really quick – and it's >>>>> long overdue. It's basically releasing the master branch......... >>>>> >>>>> 1.9.0 will be a bit more complicated – as it'll require maven plugin >>>>> upgrades and heavy testing. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we should tackle both things at the same time. There's >>>>> not even a branch for 1.9.0, and no work done towards it as far as I can >>>>> see. >>>>> >>>>> If you can make the 1.8.6 release today – it will be greatly >>>>> appreciated, JB! >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 14:52:51 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm preparing the branches for the two releases: 1.8.6 and 1.9.0 (due >>>>>> to the Java version change). >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:44:00 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi JB, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we have any instructions in the OPS4j community so I can perform >>>>>>> the release myself? We really need the 1.8.6 release ASAP! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, 20 June 2016 19:10:19 UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey, any updates on this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 17:18, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even better! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <ra...@evosent.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are >>>>>>>>>> now fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 June 2016 19:41:06 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Agree, even if I don't like that much, it makes sense. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:36:51 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So should we stick with Logback 1.1.2 and Log4j 2.3 for the >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.x release? That makes the most sense. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 13:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I'm busy with Karaf 3.0.7 (and other >>>>>>>>>>>>> Karaf subprojects) release preparation. I will tackle pax-logging >>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>> after. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:29:56 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it turns out that the upgrade from Logback 1.1.2 => >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1.7 was not as easy as I expected. In between, the developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at Logback >>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced dependencies on these additional >>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages: org.slf4j.event, org.codehaus.groovy.transform. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groovy one can be marked as optional; I'm checking the upstream >>>>>>>>>>>>>> source to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand when and how o.slf4j.event is used. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:14:26 UTC+1, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd prefer to downgrade to 2.3 in 1.8.6, then by the time we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get 1.9.0, log4j 2.6.1 should be released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, we want to avoid to break backward compability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on minor version. It's unfortunately what we did in 1.8.6. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, we have to: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Or downgrade to log4j 2.3 to still support Java 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Or remove log4j 2 support in pax-logging 1.8.x, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create new major branch 1.9 with log4j 2 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:43:05 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, do you want Java 6 or 7 compatibility in 1.8.6? If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 6, we can downgrade log4j to 2.3. If it's 7, then it can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the latest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 23:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose is: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - remove log4j2 support in pax-logging 1.8.6 and go back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Java7 compatibility >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - release pax-logging 1.9.0 with log4j2 and Java8 only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compliant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:28:40 PM UTC+2, Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for upgrading log4j to 2.6. Should get it all done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a single release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 12:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it's on my TODO for next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:00:30 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra...@evosent.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey awesome people, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upgraded Logback from 1.1.2 to 1.1.7 in master. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to make a release of pax-logging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.6? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Raúl. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> ------------------ >>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
