Great, could I request a Jira account to that end for "aj...@apache.org"? Thanks!
--- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Mar 10, 2017, at 3:43 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J > <ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > First step would be to open an Jira ticket so you (or any other team member) > can pick it up to work on it. > > Am 09.03.2017 13:52, schrieb sorok...@gmail.com: >> TinyBundle and BNDlib _were_ required as options in the test setup >> (@Configuration method) from what I could tell, or I got errors at runtime >> when the OSGi framework went looking for TinyBundle classes needed by the >> test resource bundle. Perhaps due to the asynchronous loading in that >> bundle? I will double-check, though. >> >> I really like the idea of an includeMavenResources() option as you describe. >> That's exactly what I expected and wanted. If I understood more about how >> the test probe is built, I would offer to work on that now. But I can do >> that in the future, if it seems like that's the best plan. >> >> --- >> A. Soroka >> The University of Virginia Library >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 8, 2017, at 4:13 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via >>> OPS4J<ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think an option to include a resource into the test-probe is the most >>> generic, simple and natural way. For special and/or advanced usage >>> szenarios the tinybundle option can still be used. >>> Maybe it would even be possible to have (as an extra) some sort of >>> includeMavenResources() option that builds on top of this feature and >>> fetches all resources from scr/test/resources/ and includes them since that >>> is what one would exspect when working with maven. >>> >>> BTW: are TinyBundle and BND lib are really required in the test-runtime >>> (=Test Setup)? Normally they should only be needed on construction time >>> (=test classpath). >>> >>> Am 03.03.2017 19:41, schrieb sorok...@gmail.com: >>> >>>> This was a fantastic idea! Thank you, Christoph Läubrich. >>>> >>>> I ended up building a dynamic bundle using TinyBundle containing my test >>>> resources just the way I want them arranged, and injecting it like any >>>> other bundle. I use a symbolic name to pick it back up inside the >>>> container and use the resources. >>>> >>>> One note: I did need to put TinyBundle and BNDlib into the container to >>>> support my test resource bundle, but that wasn't a big deal. I will pack >>>> that part into a new Option or even pack the whole kit and kaboodle into a >>>> some kind of "TestResourceOption". Would this be a useful PR, or would >>>> folks rather have (as Christoph Läubrich mentions) the ability to directly >>>> include resources into the test probe (which does seem a bit simpler)? >>>> >>>> Thanks, OPS4J folks! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> ------------------ >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com >>> >>> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> > > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
