Dan Thanks for the clarification. You are absolutely right. What I mean by “title” below was the name of the I-D file.
Regards Rajesh From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:39 AM To: Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan); sarik...@ieee.org; Warren Kumari Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybrid...@tools.ietf.org Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac Just to be clear – we are talking about the name of the I-D file which will anyway be lost at the publication of the future RFC (if approved). The name of the document reflects correctly the content IMO. Regards, Dan From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan) Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:58 PM To: sarik...@ieee.org<mailto:sarik...@ieee.org>; Warren Kumari Cc: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybrid...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybrid...@tools.ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac Behcet The point you raise had been brought up earlier by Dorothy S. and the text was updated appropriately. I believe it was difficult to change the title without restarting the versioning process. As a result, the title still has Hybrid-MAC in the name. So, besides the title “hybrid” does not appear anywhere else and the title will go away once this becomes a RFC. Regards Rajesh From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 1:19 PM To: Warren Kumari Cc: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybrid...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybrid...@tools.ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac Hi all, I have problem in the Hybrid MAC terminology used in this draft. The draft basically describes an improved split MAC profile as such it should be named accordingly. The draft does not define a new thing such as local MAC or split MAC as in CAPWAP documents to deserve to be called defining "hybrid MAC". If the above concern is handled, I am ready to support the adoption. Regards, Behcet On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net<mailto:war...@kumari.net>> wrote: Dear opsawg WG, The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac have indicated that they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group Last Call. The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. This WGLC ends Mon 21-Apr-2014. Thanks, Warren Kumari (as opsawg WG co-chair) _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org<mailto:OPSAWG@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
