Hi Benoit, 

Thank you for this clarification. 

If Juergen is OK to provide his review before the WGLC, I would prefer to go 
that path. That is, wait for his early review, fix any comments from Juergen, 
and then go for a last call.

Obviously, this is only my preference as an editor. I will defer to the chairs 
to decide.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 16 octobre 2017 12:24
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc : JACQUENET Christian IMT/OLN; Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-
> yang-06.txt
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Historically, the MIB doctor reviews would happen during IETF LC.
> Because YANG was new, we started early YANG doctor reviews. Those
> reviews don't have to occur in sequence, i.e. before the IETF LC starts.
> In fact, at some point in time in the future (when the YANG knowledge
> will be widely spread), the YANG doctor reviews will be triggered by the
> IETF LC.
> Bottom line: if the OPSAWG chairs believe this document is ready, it can
> progress to IETF LC now.
> 
> Regards, Benoit.
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The new version fixes some cosmetic issues (mainly, indentation of the
> YANG module) and points to YANG1.1 RFC as per a comment received from
> Mahesh Jethanandani.
> >
> > We are waiting for the yang doctors review.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Med
> >
> >> -----Message d'origine-----
> >> De : internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> >> Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2017 16:02
> >> À : Qin Wu; Senthil Sivakumar; BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; Suresh
> >> Vinapamula; JACQUENET Christian IMT/OLN
> >> Objet : New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-06.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-06.txt
> >> has been successfully submitted by Mohamed Boucadair and posted to the
> >> IETF repository.
> >>
> >> Name:              draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang
> >> Revision:  06
> >> Title:             A YANG Data Model for Network Address Translation (NAT)
> >> and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)
> >> Document date:     2017-10-11
> >> Group:             opsawg
> >> Pages:             78
> >> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-
> >> nat-yang-06.txt
> >> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-
> >> yang/
> >> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-
> 06
> >> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-
> opsawg-
> >> nat-yang-06
> >> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-
> nat-
> >> yang-06
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>     For the sake of network automation and the need for programming
> >>     Network Address Translation (NAT) function in particular, a data
> >>     model for configuring and managing the NAT is essential.  This
> >>     document defines a YANG module for the NAT function.
> >>
> >>     NAT44, Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients
> to
> >>     IPv4 Servers (NAT64), Customer-side transLATor (CLAT), Explicit
> >>     Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation (SIIT EAM), and
> >>     IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (NPTv6) are covered in this
> document.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >> submission
> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >>
> >> The IETF Secretariat
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPSAWG mailing list
> > OPSAWG@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to