Hi Tianran,
Hi Benoit,
My last question was only to check if there is enough interest on this
work, not an adoption call. There was q&a after the presentation. And
Joe cut the line because of the time.
Now this is an adoption call. You are free to suggest or object.
I just did :-)
Regards, B.
And we believe debate is really helpful.
Cheers,
Tianran
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from WeLink
*发件人： *Benoit Claise<bcla...@cisco.com <mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>>
*收件人： *Tianran Zhou<zhoutian...@huawei.com
<mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com>>;opsawg<opsawg@ietf.org
<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>;draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework.authors<draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework.auth...@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework.auth...@ietf.org>>
*抄送： *opsawg-chairs<opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
<mailto:opsawg-cha...@ietf.org>>
*主题： *Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for
draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09
*时间： *2019-12-17 20:56:58
Dear all,
After reviewing themeeting minutes
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-106-opsawg/>, I was a little
bit puzzled. From my recollection, Joe and Frank had some good
feedback on the draft.
Also, in the minutes, I did not see any mention of Joe's feedback. And
Frank's feedback on the draft is summarized as 4 words: "the scope is
large"
So I went back and reviewed the youtube video
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY-u8177wpU>.
I support Frank's feedback that this document scope is too large: a
mix of an inventory of what exists, a set of requirements, and
specifications/framework. I'm wondering: what is the scope of this
document? Before we clarify this, I don't think we should adopt this
document.
The OPSAWG chair questions at the end of the presentation were:
Chair: How many of you have read this document? quite a lot.
Chair: How many of you think this is a useful work and the working
group could
work on it? still many, 20+.
I was waiting for the negative question but to my surprise, it never
came...
Chair: How many of you don't think ...
If that question would have been asked, I would have come to mic. or
at least raised my hand.
It's important to make a distinction between the interest to solve
those problems (I believe we have full agreement) and whether this
document is a good starting point. I object to the latter, with the
document in the current form.
Regards, Benoit
Hi WG,
On IETF 106 meeting, wesaw predominant interest and support to this
draft, especially from operators. The authors then resolved all the
open issues.
As requested by the authors, this email starts a 2 weeks working
group adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/
If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give
an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if
you will be willing to review and help the draft.
If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point to
work on, please say why.
This poll will run until Dec 23..
Thanks,
Tianran as co-chair
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
