"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jcla...@cisco.com> writes: >> - Is it correct that the server type may be either one of "authentication", >> "authorization" or "accounting", or all of them? Is it impossible for a >> server to be authentication & authorization but not accounting? Such a >> variant cannot be configured. >> [Bo] OK, will correct when the final guidance on this issue is received. > > Lada replied yesterday to say that the bit string is likely preferred similar > to access-operations in ietf-netconf-acm. I might personally discourage the > use of ‘*’ for this given that there are only three types, but that’s just my > individual thought.
+1 I think it is better to have all three types explicitly in the value. Perhaps this could also be the default? Lada > > Joe > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
