thanks for review! proposed diff attached. > If the comments change, the signature changes?
yep. otherwise vast complexity lurks. but is there a text change you want? i may be naïve expecting that "a digest of the main body of the file" is sufficient. > [a] the source of the geofeed claims is authoritative to make said > claims for the contained prefixes, and iff you trust the rpki crypto chain > [b] the correctness of the claims themselves (i.e. that the location of > 2001:db8::/32 really is "Shire, Middle Earth"). above my pay grade do you have suggested text? > The text from section 4 provides a suggestion: perhaps replace > "authenticate" with "verify the authority of", or some such > formulation? hmmmm. hacked a bit. > [ section 1 ] > > * Probably the intro should hint at the authentication awesomeness contained > within. I think, actually, the last paragraph of section 2 can just be > relocated to the end of this section and it will flow well. ok > [[ nits ]] thanks! randy
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8; name="Diff draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.txt - draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.txt.html": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
