> On 10. Nov 2020, at 17:51, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > I don’t think we’ve ever formally called for adoption of this work. And this > isn’t the first time it’s been discussed (last time one criticism was IETF > wasn’t about ratifying file formats, but I think that’s debatable). We’ll > put out a call after IETF109 and see where the WG is now. Great, I really appreciate it.
Best regards Michael > > Joe > >> On Nov 9, 2020, at 14:23, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> This is good work, it’s a format used everywhere. We also need a registry >> for option extensions that IANA could provide. And we have some ideas as to >> how to use that. >> >> Eliot >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSAWG mailing list >> OPSAWG@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
