Well, "whatever", but I liked the paragraph we had arrived at. A
-----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> Sent: 02 February 2021 00:37 To: Erik Kline <ek.i...@gmail.com> Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofe...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds >> 8805 was, of course, an Independent Stream production. So I carry as much >> responsibility as anyone else for the lack of privacy discussion. But, more >> significantly, I am entirely responsible for not having noted section 4 of >> RFC 8805 when I wrote my email - oops. > > Yeah, I was pretty sure we had written something. =) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8805.html#name-privacy-considerations and i am guilty of not rereading 8805 may i suggest that finding-geofeeds merely say All the privacy considerations of RFC8804 Section 4 apply to this document. saves a lot of words thereby reducing the rfc editor fee. randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
