Dear OPSAWG,
The notes of the last desing meeting:
LxNM Design Team Meeting
________________________________
<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Date-15-04-2021>Date: 15-04-2021
<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Participants>Participants

     *   Roque Gagliano
     *   Luis Angel Muñoz
     *   Sergio Belloti
     *   Raul Arco
     *   Mohamed Boucadair
     *   Victor Lopez
     *   Oscar Gonzalez de dios
     *   Samier Barrguil

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Agenda>Agenda

     *   Review latest changes<https://tinyurl.com/l3nm-latest> to the L3NM to 
address the WGLC comments.

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Discussion>Discussion

     *   Check issue #269<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/269>

        *   Review if this is something vendor specific.
        *   Not clear the usability of this parameters in the NBI.
        *   Roque explained that the use case is for the Inter-domain 
connectivy for PE-CE connectivity.
        *   Nokia does not require this kind of configuration.
        *   Multi-hop EBGP connection against the CE.
     *   Check issue #266<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/266>

        *   Agree to add the pointer of a virtual interface to terminate the 
customer services.
     *   Check issue #273<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/273>

        *   RIP and NTP activation. Part of the Network infrastructure 
configuration. This was a last minute comment.
        *   For the NTP we need to include the rationale/paramters + add 
athentication.
     *   Check issue #275<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/275>

        *   no-prepend-global-asin the model there is no such thing as “global 
as”. There are local-autonompus-system at vpn-node level and vpn-network-access 
level. There is mandatory to check how to enable this functionality when the AS 
at “vpn-node” level is different from the Local AS of the VPN network access.
     *   Check the issue 
[#266](https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/266

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Action-Points>Action Points

     *   Close issue #266<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/266>.
     *   For issue #273<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/273> add 
the authentication support.
     *   For issue #275<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/275> 
check how to relate the global AS and local AS in the model.
     *   The updated version of the L3NM will be submitted early next week

Regards,


Samier Barguil
Transport & IP Networks | GCTIO - Technology | CIT Centro Integrado de 
Transporte |

Móvil +57 3017026430

Móvil +34 665416074

E-mail samier.barguilgiraldo....@telefonica.com

E-mail samier.barg...@wipro.com

________________________________
De: SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO <samier.barguilgiraldo....@telefonica.com>
Enviado: viernes, 9 de abril de 2021 9:51
Para: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: Oscar González de Dios <oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>
Asunto: RE: LxNM Desing Team -- Minutes





LXNM Desing Team Meeting
________________________________
<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Date>Date:

08-04-2021

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Assistants>Assistants

  *   Roque Gagliano
  *   Raul Arco
  *   Mohamed Boucadair
  *   Luis Angel Muñoz
  *   Victor Lopez
  *   Oscar Gonzalez de dios
  *   Samier Barrguil

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Agenda>Agenda

  *   Review the implementation section.
  *   Review of the open issues.

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Discussion>Discussion

  *   Roque ask about the possibility to add cisco as part of the 
implementation section in the L3NM and the L2NM.
  *   In this moment the draft has pointers to the 
implementation<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/tree/master/Implementattion>
 support of each vendor.
  *   VPN common has been submited this morning.
  *   Review the comments done by Druvh in the 
issue<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/263>

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Action-Points>Action Points

  *   Check the status of the implementation sections. @Oscar
  *   Check the new issues and It’s solutions opened by Roque. @Med and @Samier
  *   Check the status of the document for the last-call review. @all

Regards,


Samier Barguil
Transport & IP Networks | GCTIO - Technology | CIT Centro Integrado de 
Transporte |

Móvil +57 3017026430

Móvil +34 665416074

E-mail samier.barguilgiraldo....@telefonica.com

E-mail samier.barg...@wipro.com

________________________________
De: SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO
Enviado: jueves, 25 de marzo de 2021 19:57
Para: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: Oscar González de Dios <oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>
Asunto: LxNM Desing Team -- Minutes

LXNM Desing Team Meeting
Date:

25-03-2021

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Assistants0>Assistants

  *   Bo Wu
  *   Qin Wu
  *   Luis Muñoz
  *   Raul Arco
  *   Oscar Gonzalez de dios
  *   Samier Barrguil

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Agenda0>Agenda

  *   Review of the open issues owned and opened by Qin Wu.
  *   Review the ESI issue

<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Discussion0>Discussion

  *   Issue 201<https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/issues/224>. Fast 
re-route i the L2NM.
     *   There are two scenarios sing and dual homing.
     *   Both requires the configuration of FRR in the PEs.
     *   Enable FRR for MAC routes between the local and remote end.
     *   Option #1: In both cases the global configuration of FRR applies.
     *   Option #2: Configure the FRR as part of the Far-End Configuration.
     *   How it is done today at device level

Cisco: By default, no backup next hop address is set for FRR.

Huawei: Sample configuration delivered by Qin.

Huawei: EVPN VPWS configuration Example(Interface+EVPL instance+EVPN instance)

Nokia: Raul is going to check if this is something supported in Nokia at 
service level or control plane.
<https://codimd.ietf.org/#Action-Points>Action Points

  *   Add samples on the text how the Single Active and Active/Active scenarios 
are covered by the model. @RaulArco
  *   Move the Ethernet Segment Identifier at VPN Network Access level. @Samier
  *   Add new issues to the GitHub based on expert review @Qin 
Wu<mailto:bill...@huawei.com>

Regards,


Samier Barguil
Transport & IP Networks | GCTIO - Technology | CIT Centro Integrado de 
Transporte |

Móvil +57 3017026430

Móvil +34 665416074

E-mail samier.barguilgiraldo....@telefonica.com

E-mail samier.barg...@wipro.com

________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to