Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) The SR labels can also be programmed by a PCE (rfc8664). For completeness, it would be very nice if a codepoint was also allocated for that. (2) The "Additional Information" field in the IPFIX Information Elements registry includes information about mplsTopLabelType that will now be incomplete -- it currently says: See [RFC3031] for the MPLS label structure. See [RFC4364] for the association of MPLS labels with Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). See [RFC4271] for BGP and BGP routing. See [RFC5036] for Label Distribution Protocol (LDP). See the list of MPLS label types assigned by IANA at [http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-label-values]. It would be nice to add information here about the new fields. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
