Hi Alvaro, Thanks for the feedback. It appears I need reading glasses.
I added a IANA note for moving the RFC references from the additional information to the reference column. https://www.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/graf3net/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type/master/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-10.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/graf3net/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type/master/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-11.txt As soon as I have the feedback from Benjamin, I will submit -11 and move forward to the RFC editor queue. Best wishes Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 6:11 PM To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-TCZ-ZH1 <thomas.g...@swisscom.com>; i...@ietf.org Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-t...@ietf.org; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-08: (with COMMENT) On September 5, 2021 at 2:45:59 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: Thomas: Hi! ... > Regarding the second remark. Updating the "Additional Information" in > the IPFIX Information Elements registry for mplsTopLabelType. > > Throughout the process we had a lengthy exchange with IANA and the IE > doctors what the best course of action is since "Additional > Information" is not publicly visible. We came to the conclusion that > this is addressed best by adding the RFC which is describing the code point > to the "Reference" > column. The "Additional Information" column *is* publicly visible -- that is how I found it. ;-) https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2Fipfix.xhtml%23ipfix-information-elements&data=04%7C01%7CThomas.Graf%40swisscom.com%7C4b2206a9ee624de0a93808d973ac7840%7C364e5b87c1c7420d9beec35d19b557a1%7C0%7C0%7C637668006849700536%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=MQPTRcTrtgJJM4IuF%2BgI9Byy0rLRoIVKlWVaxW4wV98%3D&reserved=0 > I could add an IANA remark that for the existing entries in > mplsTopLabelType, the RFC references described in "Additional > Information" could be moved to the reference column. That works for me -- I'm assuming you would also add a reference to this document, right? What about the current text in "Additional Information"? If it is left as-is, I think may still look incomplete (regardless of what the reference column points to). Thanks! Alvaro.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
