I am reviewing -07 of this draft ahead of the shepherd review. I have found a few nits, but at a larger level, I think more text might be needed for IANA around how to handle the new TLS hash registry. Currently, the draft talks about a sync to “IANA TLS HashAlgorithm Registry”, which is good. But what if new values get added to the cipher suites registry? For example, what about GOST variants? I would think if the TLS 1.3 spec (and their experts) allow for these algorithms would this registry not just take them? What would the expert review consider when adding new algorithms here?
In terms of nits: Search for “ciphersuites” and change to “cipher suites” as that is more consistent with other documents (and I think you use both in this document). Section 2.1: s/Values zero through 2/Values 0 through 2/ Section 2.3: s/stated that TLSTM/states that TLSTM/ Section 3.1: s/request, offer or use/request, offer, or use/ Section 7 Add a period to the end of the section. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
