Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have not much to add to my esteemed collegue's Éric::Vyncke/128 review, two nits: | +--rw under-maintenance! | | +--rw contact string This could use a freeform field or duration field to hold information about expected maintenance time, as that would be the main question anyone could have for the contact person :) description "This module extends the ietf-service-assurance-device module to add specific support for devices of ACME Corporation. "; I would somehow put in the Example word in there to avoid anyone thinking that this is a real definition. I know it is stated before, but implementers just scanning code might miss it :) _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
