> On 8. Dec 2022, at 21:34, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkh...@sit.fraunhofer.de>
> wrote:
>
> Dear OPSAWG members,
>
> this starts a Working Group Adoption call for a bundle of two documents:
>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-05.html
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-richardson-opsawg-pcaplinktype-01.html
>
> ending on Monday, December 30th.
>
> As a recap: we already went through a first WGLC for
> draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03 and this is the second WGLC. The last WGLC did
> not yield a critical mass of active support.
>
> Since the last WGLC, two relevant decisions were made:
>
> 1.) The Intended Status of the main document draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng is
> now Informational.
>
> 2.) The draft-richardson-opsawg-pcaplinktype document was split from the main
> documents, focuses solely on the PCAP LINK Type registry content, and retains
> the Intended Status Standards Track (as informational documents cannot
> request a registry).
>
> As a generic reminder, these internet drafts describe the PCAPng format and
> its corresponding registry - retaining the established design patterns of
> PCAP and adding new capabilities as well as a an extensibility feature.
> Please note that the corresponding document
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap-01.html was adopted in
> October 2021 and its Intended Status is Historical.
>
> Please reply with your active support (+1 required) or objections and
> especially any substantive comments you may have.
+1. (Obvious at least for one document, since I'm a co-author).
Best regards
Michael
>
> For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
>
> Henk
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
