> The I-D lacks much useful information compared with the tcpdump website
> which you say this replaces, notably the references that the website
> links to for the various llnk specifications.. Given the inadequacy of
> the references in the I-D (setting aside those related to the
> linktype), then I cannot be confident that the authors will do anything
> to address this deficiency.
So if I am understanding you Tom, you prefer the web site content, and don't
trust the authors to be responsive during a WG process, and you don't think
that the WG will listen to your requests, and you think that the WG will
publish the document without changes?
Do you understand that the authors/maintainers of the web site are in fact the
authors of the document?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
