I have uploaded an update that more accurately indicates that a "session" is a 
secure association between two instances of the TLSTM.

Regards,
Ken Vaughn

Trevilon LLC
1060 S Hwy 107
Del Rio, TN 37727
+1-571-331-5670 cell
kvau...@trevilon.com <mailto:kvau...@trevilon.com>
www.trevilon.com <http://www.trevilon.com/>

> On Feb 9, 2023, at 6:56 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org 
> <mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-11
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2023-02-09
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-02-20
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues:
>    In the fourth paragraph of section 1.1, the text refers to "a secure
>    association between two TLS Transport Models (TLSTMs)".  As I understand
>    the terminology, there is one TLSTM.  There are two instances of /
>    realizations of the model.  Should the sentence refer to instances or
>    realizations, rather than two models? (i-d nits gets confused by the
>    references to rfc 5953 in the revision description.  After looking at it, I
>    realized there was no problem here, rather it is accurate.  A comment on
>    this in item 14 of the shepherd writeup would have been helpful.)
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: N/A
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org <mailto:OPSAWG@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to