Thank you.
Joel
On 2/15/2023 10:50 AM, Kenneth Vaughn wrote:
I have uploaded an update that more accurately indicates that a
"session" is a secure association between two /_instances of_ /the TLSTM.
Regards,
Ken Vaughn
Trevilon LLC
1060 S Hwy 107
Del Rio, TN 37727
+1-571-331-5670 cell
kvau...@trevilon.com
www.trevilon.com <http://www.trevilon.com/>
On Feb 9, 2023, at 6:56 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker
<nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-11
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2023-02-09
IETF LC End Date: 2023-02-20
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed
Standard RFC
Major issues: N/A
Minor issues:
In the fourth paragraph of section 1.1, the text refers to "a secure
association between two TLS Transport Models (TLSTMs)". As I
understand
the terminology, there is one TLSTM. There are two instances of /
realizations of the model. Should the sentence refer to instances or
realizations, rather than two models? (i-d nits gets confused by the
references to rfc 5953 in the revision description. After looking
at it, I
realized there was no problem here, rather it is accurate. A
comment on
this in item 14 of the shepherd writeup would have been helpful.)
Nits/editorial comments: N/A
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
