Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for working on this specification. Special thanks for the shepherd's write-up, it was very helpful. I was just wondering - as there is an intended impact on the future here, "Renegotiation of sessions is not supported as it is not supported by TLS 1.3." what is the intended implication on the application of future versions of TLS? _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
