Hi Med, Good point. Omitting the IE would work as well.
Regards, Benoit From:mohamed.boucadair <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> To:Thomas.Graf <thomas.g...@swisscom.com>;jgs <j...@juniper.net> Cc:The IESG <i...@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-...@ietf.org>;opsawg-chairs <opsawg-cha...@ietf.org>;opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org> Date:2023-05-25 21:05:58 Subject:RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Hi Thomas, Why sending a zero length array is needed especially that the decompression is done at the data collector? Shouldn't this just work if srhIPv6Section is omitted when there is no SRH? Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : thomas.g...@swisscom.com <thomas.g...@swisscom.com> > Envoyé : mercredi 24 mai 2023 18:05 > À : j...@juniper.net > Cc : i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-...@ietf.org; > opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> > Objet : Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6- > srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Dear John, > > My apology. Your assumption is correct. > > In case when the compressed SID container is only used in the IPv6 > destination address of the provider data plane and the SRH is not > being present at all, it would be a zero lenght array. > > Best wishes > Thomas > > > On 24 May 2023, at 17:32, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote: > > > > Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > > > >> On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: > >> > >> And what > >> of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare > cSID, would > >> it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? > > > > Regards, > > > > —John > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
