> Absent implementation of the geofeed: attribute in a particular IRR > database > > if so, it was intentional. perhaps s/IRR/Whois/? > > JMC: Yep. I see what you’re saying now. I was reading as RIR. I > think IRR is fine, but perhaps it should be expanded like you do RIR > earlier.
sure > > My biggest gripe in the diff is that your “Implementation Status” > > section has normative language, which seemed odd to me. > > that MAY is from 9092. but i take your point and downcased it. > > JMC: Thanks. There are two MUSTs there, too around how to interpret > ARIN data. darn. missed them in the xml cloud. i suspect these recommendations for dealing with arin data belong in a whole new section massimo has suggested, explicit instructions on fetching geofeed data. randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
