I support the progression of these documents. They fill an important gap by 
modelling attachment circuits in more detail than had been done in the past, 
and therefore have high value.

thanks

Julian



Juniper Business Use Only

From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" 
<jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 15:41
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List 
<t...@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC: Attachment circuits work

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Thanks to efforts by the WG and cross-collaboration with TEAS, these four 
drafts are at the point to run a WG LC.  All currently reported issues have 
been resolved by the authors, and we are grateful to have four volunteers for 
shepherds.

The Attachment Circuits work is divided into four documents:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Fnxe1-2NfP5ssRCICxqRNG3R2axqEEvtMZBq2UIvrcI_maSYRQbVnwx8-iB59N3ikMcI3Dn0sKyd3Jq0YKzaG52ShlH3ldw$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Fnxe1-2NfP5ssRCICxqRNG3R2axqEEvtMZBq2UIvrcI_maSYRQbVnwx8-iB59N3ikMcI3Dn0sKyd3Jq0YKzaG52SdROl2aQ$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Fnxe1-2NfP5ssRCICxqRNG3R2axqEEvtMZBq2UIvrcI_maSYRQbVnwx8-iB59N3ikMcI3Dn0sKyd3Jq0YKzaG52SkelHBUg$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Fnxe1-2NfP5ssRCICxqRNG3R2axqEEvtMZBq2UIvrcI_maSYRQbVnwx8-iB59N3ikMcI3Dn0sKyd3Jq0YKzaG52SlYyZgco$>

Given the size of the work, we will run for a three-week LC period (closing on 
May 10), and we are copying teas@ for additional reviews.  Please reply on-list 
with comments.

Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to