0) Why is this document still kicking around the WG? (Too bad it doesn't have the word "mud" in the filename.)
1) I find the title confusing. 2) I don't think that AUGMENT does what you want, because YANG is not extensible in the way we are used to doing with IANA. 3) I think that you have to revise the MUD specification itself. internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.txt is now available. It is a work item > of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. > Title: Ownership and licensing statements in YANG > Authors: Eliot Lear > Carsten Bormann > Name: draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.txt > Pages: 8 > Dates: 2024-04-18 > Abstract: > This memo provides for an extension to RFC 8520 that allows MUD file > authors to specify ownership and licensing of MUD files themselves. > This memo updates RFC 8520. However, it can also be used for > purposes outside of MUD, and the grouping is structured as such. > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ol/ > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.html > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05 > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg