Hi Henk, All,
I support the adoption of this document as coauthor.

Regards,

Giuseppe

-----Original Message-----
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> 
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 11:59 AM
To: OPSAWG <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG]🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-01

Dear OPSAWG members,

this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of

> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-
> 01

ending on Saturday, July 6th. That is a little bit of an odd duration, but the 
I-D is crisp and concise and if there is rough consensus after that time, this 
work may become a WG item before the upcoming cut-off.

As a reminder, this I-D specifies IPFIX Information Elements for the 
Alternate-Marking Method as defined in RFC9341 & RFC9342; a technique for 
measuring packet loss, delay, and jitter of packets in-flight.

The chairs acknowledge positive feedback and some review on the list and we 
would like to gather feedback from the WG if there is interest to further 
contribute and review.

Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments you may 
have.


For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to