Hi John,
Thanks for identifying those nits! More comments about them inline.
On 5/31/25 8:39 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
While working on the shepherd writeup I found some nits that the authors
should address.
192.0.0.0/22 used as an example network, but only 192.0.2.0/24 is
reserved for examples
We'll update the example to use only 192.0.2.0/24 and suprefixes.
Downref to informational RFC 4180 which defines CSV format
We refer to RFC 4180 ("Common Format and MIME Type for Comma-Separated
Values (CSV) Files") when stating that prefixlen files are CSV
files. Should we change this to an informative reference? Or should we
propose to add RFC 4180 to the downref registry?
Downref to informational RFC 8805 which defines geofeed format, also a
downref in 9092 and 9632
We'll change RFC 8805 to an informational reference, as we only use
that in the Acks section anyway.
Neither of those are in the downref registry at https://
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref/
Reference to RFC 7234 which has been obsoleted by 9111
We'll update the reference to point to RFC 9111 ("HTTP Caching").
Reference to RFC 9092 which has been obsoleted by 9632
We'll remove the reference to RFC 9092, as RFC 9632 is already referenced.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Cheers,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]