Hi Sasha,

Minor comment.
In the title you wrote RFC9251, while in the message you refer to RFC9291,  it 
seems the title should be corrected.

Regards,
Nitsan

From: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2025 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Discussion List 
<[email protected]>
Subject: PW Operational Status in RFC 9251

Dear authors of RFC 9291<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9291>,

I have looked up the standard and found that it presumably mentions Operational 
Status of a pseudowire as oper-status without any clarifications and/or 
references, and, specifically, without any association with various indicators 
in the PW Status TLV.

This is quite different from RFC 
5601<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5601>,  which explicitly provides 
such linkage as can be seen from the quoted text below:

  pwOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE
     SYNTAX        PwOperStatusTC
     MAX-ACCESS    read-only
     STATUS        current
     DESCRIPTION
          "This object indicates the operational status of the PW; it
           does not reflect the status of the Customer Edge (CE) bound
           interface.  It is set to down only if pwNotForwarding,
           psnFacingPwRxFault, or psnFacingPwTxFault indications are
           set in pwLocalStatus or pwRemoteStatus.
           It indicates 'lowerLayerDown' if the only reason for
           not being in the 'up' state is that either the outer tunnel
           or physical layer of the network side is in the 'down'
           state.
           All other states are declared based on the description
           of the PwOperStatusTC.
           "

I wonder whether, from your POV, the quoted definition of the PW Operatonal 
Status is still applicable or not.


Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
Sasha

Disclaimer

This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon 
Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary 
for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or 
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to