Joe Clarke \(jclarke\) <[email protected]> wrote: > We are closing the WG LC on this. There have been several reviews and > a new rev of the draft based on them. I thank Dhruv for his OPS DIR > review, too.
I did look through it when, but I had little to say about it.
My concern was really about how/if RFC8520 (MUD), which uses RFC8519
(the precusor to ucl-acl) should update.
> Given the support – albeit light – and no objection, we will await the
> shepherd review and write-up from Chongfeng, and then move this forward
> to the IESG. That you, WG!
Did we get RADEXT review?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
