Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This was a clear document and it seems to provide a useful set of defintions. I have the following (non-blocking) comments: 1. Abstract The present abstract reads more like a problem statememt for the work, than a summary of the key things being standardised. I suggest this current text still may be useful intoroduction, but the abstract could more be usefully based on the text in the first para of section 3.1. 2. Section 3.5? Would it be helpful for the words "equal forwarding treatment" be replaced by the defined term "Equal-Forwarding-Treatment" for more consistency? Best wishes, Gorry _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
