Hi Ton, Yes, I am using passive checks..
Thank you for the good news, looking forward to the new release. Regards, Nikolay On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Ton Voon <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19 Mar 2010, at 09:41, Nikolay Popov wrote: > > In our organisation we have been using Opsview for over a year now, >> migrating from OpenView. Thank you for a great product. >> >> We have recently seen a problem with too many passive alarms (send_nsca) >> being received for HOST/service, which in turn lead to a lot of notification >> being generated and sent to our ticket system. Imagine closing a few >> thousand tickets :-( >> > > I assume you have defined a passive service check? > > Funnily enough, we just last week finished a feature in trunk where "alert > every failure" has a third option (disable, enable, enable with > re-notification interval). So passive results will not flood notifications, > though each alert will be logged (so you can see in event view). > > This is a complex change (Nagios code changes), so you'll have to wait for > 3.7.0, due mid April. > > Ton > > _______________________________________________ > Opsview-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users >
_______________________________________________ Opsview-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
