Then perhaps complaining about the direction of the work that many others have done pro bono is a little premature, no?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:18, Peter <necedema...@gmail.com> wrote: > Heh, well, I tell you what. You send me a hundred thousand dollars, > and after the check clears I'll write you a great windows kernel > driver. Otherwise, I'm broke, my life is a living hell, and I already > have several projects I work on out of the goodness of my heart, so, > I'm sorry. > > Thanks and good luck. > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Flamsmark<flamsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why not just a Windows kernel driver? Because it hasn't been written yet. > > You're welcome to help write a kernel driver, or a VPN host or whatever > else > > you think is the next logical step to improving Tor. However, remember > the > > version number: 0.2.1.*. Tor is not a 'finished' piece of software. It is > > not feature-complete; it does not implement everything that's either > desired > > or required for ideal use. However, right now, much of the development > > effort is not spent making it easier for clients to use. There's a > feeling > > that it's currently 'good enough' that those who really need to use Tor > will > > be able to follow the instructions and get it working. If you don't agree > > with that emphasis, again, it's your prerogative to build those feature > that > > you think are most important. > > We all look forward to seeing your contributions! >