> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gogala, Mladen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Oracle works on ReiserFS as well as on Ext2. My personal preference
> was ReiserFS because of the abominable fsck times with my big
> disks (32GB &
> 20GB).
I am confused - did you choose ReiserFS because you wanted abominable fsck times, and that's what you got with ReiserFS, or because you wanted to avoid abominable fsck times, and abominable fsck times are a feature of Ext2 but not ReiserFS?
