Sorry for being unclear. ReiserFS has much, much, much faster fsck then
Ext2.
With ReiserFS (a.k.a Ext3), fsck takes a second or two, not longer. With
ext2
it can go on forever, especially on /oracle, /mp3 or /usr/local filesystems.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gogala, Mladen [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
>
> Oracle works on ReiserFS as well as on Ext2. My personal preference
> was ReiserFS because of the abominable fsck times with my big
> disks (32GB &
> 20GB).
I am confused - did you choose ReiserFS because you wanted abominable fsck
times, and that's what you got with ReiserFS, or because you wanted to avoid
abominable fsck times, and abominable fsck times are a feature of Ext2 but
not ReiserFS?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Gogala, Mladen
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
