> Here's me publishing war-n-peace to solve
> a problem that takes 4 lines of code...

True, but your PL/SQL solution is fast.

Using a correlated subquery to find the top three rows works fine against
EMP, but what happens when it goes against a table with 100,000 rows?  This
subquery runs 100,000 times:

where 3 > (select count(*) from tablea y where y.sales > x.sales)

The correlated subquery solution will run forever and a day, and an index
won't help.  If you can't do an in-line view, forget the correlated
subquery, no matter how short it is, and use PL/SQL.

Am I missing something here?

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Greg Moore
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to