I'm not really sure that this is a question or a declaration of discomfort.
If you are looking for a very thorough book on the internal structure of windows 2000 then I would highly recommend the book by Russinovich and Solomon, "Inside Windows 2000" as a start, then, as someone familiar with C, you should move on to "rogramming Applications for Microsoft Windows". Once you have that foundation you can start to get more and more familiar with the internals by examining the source for the various utilities that exist on sysinternals.com. Sysinternals.com has a number of internals white papers that explain explicit details as well. To go further than that you can find an overabundance of information on microsofts msdn website at msdn.microsoft.com. The problem with the windows perfmon utility is the overabundance of counters, not the lack of them. You DO have to understand the OS architecture and even details to properly tune a windows system. But, just like on the various flavors of Unix, there are a number of key counters that you can use to get 80% of your tuning done. Its that 20% that requires real expertise. There is also a problem with the fact that the OS is more of a black box than Linux or BSD, but the reality is that MS has convinced many companies to use windows. Its your Choice to be familiar with it or not. I'm all for choice, especially when it comes to performance profiling. It IS my opinion there are advantages to systems like Linux when you have the time and money to put into a tuning effort for a deep profile of a system. Oracle is going full speed ahead with Red Hat's advanced server addressing some of the previous issues with OS cluster software and kernelized async io, but the fact remains that there are more Oracle systems out there running on windows than linux. Regards, Michael Sale Author: Oracle9i for Windows(R) 2000 Tips & Techniques http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072194626 -----Original Message----- Gogala Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:49 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L On 2002.05.29 09:08 Michael P Sale wrote: > There is no direct equivalent of sar on windows via the command line, > but there is a utility called perfmon that can log much more detail > regarding CPU than sar can. How about paging, swapping, disk I/O, and buffer cache hit rate? IS there any good book explaining the internals of NT (Win 2k) in the fashion similar to the one "MAgic Garden Explained" or "Design and Implementation od 4.4 BSD" or Maurice Bach's "System V"? I'm very reluctant to use the system which doesn't publish it's internal structure. THat is precisely why I'm using Linux at home. -- Mladen Gogala -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Mladen Gogala INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Michael P Sale INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
