There has been some good stuff on the Usenet list lately about the debating the usefulness of "CACHE" as opposed to KEEP buffer pool.
Ethan Post perotdba (AIM), epost1 (Yahoo) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:53 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Given the fact that the table is so small and frequently accessed, it will get cached 'automagically'. No need to do anything. Anjo. On Thursday 05 September 2002 23:43, you wrote: > Rachel, > With a table that small I would consider caching the table to > eliminate the io. > I do not know if you can cache an IOT but then it should be even > faster. > Ron > ROR -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Post, Ethan INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
