Jared, I don't know about the rest of the list members, but the company I work for would like to have the technology but without the additional license expense. Therefore were going to do the standby database thing instead of RAC. Now if your into using Linux with low end PC's then maybe you can justify it. I don't know, it gives me the whillies when the software costs more than the hardware and OS combined.
Dick Goulet ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Author: Jared Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2/11/2003 8:29 AM This is all cool technology, and fun stuff to play with. It all begs the questions, "How many of us work for a business that actually need this?" "Are they willing to pay $400/user $20k/CPU above the cost of Oracle 9i EE to use it?" "Are they willing to pay the extra overhead required to maintain it?" I'm not sure the ROI is there for many of us. Though downtime at our business is somewhat expensive, I think that a failover system or even standby database will provide adequate coverage for us, which is indeed a hot topic here right now, after our Dell SAN put us out of business for 36 hours. RAC wouldn't have helped much there. Niether would a cluster for that matter. Standby DB would have been perfect. This whole push of RAC by Oracle reminds me very much of the mlife phone campaign by ATT. Do you really need to take pictures with your phone? And what is the point of sending text messages to someone elses phone when you could just call them? ATT needs you to buy this stuff, because they have it for sale. I see RAC in a similar light. Do you need RAC? Oracle needs you to 'need' it, because they need some reason for you to spend more money on their product. Jared On Saturday 08 February 2003 21:23, Richard Ji wrote: > To those who are interested in running RAC on Linux. > I know we have been talking about RAC on linux lately. This is great news > Redhat has made a special developer's edition for their Advanced Server > which > only costs $60! So we don't have to shell out $699 for a copy of RHAS 2.1 > to play with RAC. > > http://www.redhat.com/software/advancedserver/developer/ > > Have fun. > > Richard Ji -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jared Still INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).