my reasons to recommend an external storage
was..
1) the database size is 36GB, and according to many
documents i have read, SAN is not cost effevtive unless populated
by a large numbers of drives !!, now for the client
the cost is not the factor.. given the situation.. wouldnt a SAN be an overkill
?
2) NO DBA or SYS ADMIN skills to manage the SAN !!
|
- why SAN ? why not external storage ? Rahul
- Re: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Tim Gorman
- Re:why SAN ? why not external storage ? dgoulet
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? DENNIS WILLIAMS
- Re: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Tim Gorman
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Jesse, Rich
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Rich . Jesse
- Re: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Rahul
- Re: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Arun Annamalai
- Re[2]: why SAN ? why not external storage ? dgoulet
- Re: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Mogens Nørgaard
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Brian Dunbar
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Deshpande, Kirti
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Nelson, Allan
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Scott . Shafer
- Re:RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? dgoulet
- RE: RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Scott . Shafer
- RE: why SAN ? why not external storage ? Niall Litchfield