OK, I went and looked in the 8i Concepts manual.  It seems pretty clear
that Application Context variables are used as bind variables.  It may have
changed for 9i, but I can't see how or why.

"Application Context


Application context facilitates the implementation of fine-grained access
control. It allows you to implement security policies with functions and
then associate those security policies with applications. Each application
can have its own application-specific context. Users are not allowed to
arbitrarily change their context (for example, through SQL*Plus).


Application contexts permit flexible, parameter-based access control, based
on attributes of interest to an application. For example, context
attributes for a human resources application could include "position",
"organizational unit", and "country" while attributes for an order-entry
control might be "customer number" and "sales region".

You can:
- Base predicates on context values
- Use context values within predicates, as bind variables    <<<< NOTE THIS
LINE.>>>>>
- Set user attributes
- Access user attributes "

Jack C. Applewhite
Database Administrator
Austin Independent School District
Austin, Texas
512.414.9715 (wk)
512.935.5929 (pager)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



                                                                                       
                                       
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               
                                        
                      >                        To:       Multiple recipients of list 
ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          
                      Sent by:                 cc:                                     
                                       
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Subject:  Re: Re: Row level security 
and latch waits                           
                      .com                                                             
                                       
                                                                                       
                                       
                                                                                       
                                       
                      08/19/2003 01:39                                                 
                                       
                      PM                                                               
                                       
                      Please respond to                                                
                                       
                      ORACLE-L                                                         
                                       
                                                                                       
                                       
                                                                                       
                                       




its just appending a where clause. its not binding it.

im not familiar with contexts. never worked with them. someone correct me
if im wrong here? Could have sworn i read that somewhere.

i looked up application contexts. they appear to be handled differently.

am i wrong?
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2003/08/19 Tue PM 02:14:25 EDT
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Row level security and latch waits
>
>
> RLS doesn't use bind variables?  How then does Oracle treat the
Application
> Context variables that you include in the predicates generated by the
> Security Policy functions?  If those aren't bind variables then I guess I
> don't know what bind variables are.
>
> Please refer me to the documentation on which your assertion is based.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jack C. Applewhite
> Database Administrator
> Austin Independent School District
> Austin, Texas
> 512.414.9715 (wk)
> 512.935.5929 (pager)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>                       >                        To:       Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                       Sent by:                 cc:

>                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Subject:  Re: Row level
security and latch waits
>                       .com

>

>

>                       08/19/2003 10:44

>                       AM

>                       Please respond to

>                       ORACLE-L

>

>

>
>
>
>
> row level security doesnt use bind variables.
>
> dont know if there is a way to get it to use them. thats probably your
> problem.
> >
> > From: "Jamadagni, Rajendra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2003/08/19 Tue AM 11:19:24 EDT
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Row level security and latch waits
> >
> > hi all,
> >
> > in the latest code release, a group implemented RLS and since then
> spotlight
> > is constantly flagging 'latch waits' in the system. Yesterday the latch
> > waits were upwards of 90%.
> >
> > Most active sessions seem to run the policy function defined as part of
> RLS.
> > The worst part was all this wait was only on one node, the other node
was
> > healthy.
> >
> > While we are trying to capture more information, anything else that we
> can
> > do? Any ideas?  TIA
> >
> > Raj
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> > ----
> > Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
>
>
> >
> hi all,
>
>
> in the latest code release, a group implemented RLS and since then
> spotlight is constantly flagging 'latch waits' in the system. Yesterday
the
> latch waits were upwards of 90%.
>
>
> Most active sessions seem to run the policy function defined as part of
> RLS. The worst part was all this wait was only on one node, the other
node
> was healthy.
>
>
> While we are trying to capture more information, anything else that we
can
> do? Any ideas?  TIA
>
>
> Raj
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author:
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).






-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to