Coming to think of it, is the 3Mb size is for stripped or unstripped executable?.
I know 3Mb if stripped is not likely to come to 40K. Nevertheless the memory
addressing for UNIX is diff. from Windoz. May be someone else in the list
has a better knowledge of it.
GovindanK
<-----Original Message----->
| From: Tanel Poder Sent: 9/20/2003 2:44:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: wrapping packages I checked, the wrap executable in 8.0.6 dist for solaris is about 3MB, but for 9.2 in Windows it's only about 40k. It shouldn't be that hard to reverse engineer it. Probably the ones who already have cracked the algorithm aren't spreading the knowledge - why should they anyway?! Tanel. ----- Original Message ----- To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:29 AM > Hi Pete > > I must point out that there must be a unwrap, since the Oracle database > can run the wrapped pl/sql code :-) > > It is based on trust in Oracle coopera! tion / development. > > Some times it would make since to write the code in c/c++ since it > harder to revers. > > Pete Finnigan wrote: > > >Hi > > > >Very true, but if there was the wrap process wouldn't be much use as > >anyone could un wrap your code. But you are right the main reason to be > >cautious is to not delete your source code locally. > > > >kind regards > > > >Pete > > > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bhabani s pradhan > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > > > > >>one caution: > >> > >>there is no unwrap cmd/exe > >> > >>Regards > >> |
_______________________________________________________________
Get Your 10MB account for FREE at http://mail.arabia.com !
