Thanks a lot for your reply, Cary.

One follow-up question. What would motivate "a chat"
of sometimes 5, sometimes 10-20 'SQL*Net message
to/from client' consecutive wait lines emitted to the
trace file in the following manner:

WAIT #0: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2
p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #0: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 678
p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #0: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1
p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #0: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3463
p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #0: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1
p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #0: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3322
p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
....

I see this pattern of "message exchanges" before
calling a stored code from the app server (OCI), so
using forward attribution it is a call to a stored
code that it to blame correct?
I can't of course eliminate a call to a stored code
but is there something that can be done to minimize
amount of these 'SQL*Net message...' lines? While the
latency of these waits is low, these 3-5 milliseconds
get accumulated slowly, but surely.

Also does cursor #0 has some special meaning in
traces? I can't seem to create a test-case where I get
cursor #0 emitted for me and yet tracing real
applications I see it all over (like in the excerpt
above)


I guess I have more than one follow-up question :-(

Thanks,
Boris Dali.

 --- Cary Millsap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
>.... 
> >WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1
> p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
> >WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela=
> 692 p1=1413697536 p2=1
> p3=0
> >WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1
> p1=1413697536 p2=1
> p3=0 >FETCH
>
#31:c=0,e=261,p=0,cr=7,cu=0,mis=0,r=4,dep=0,og=4,tim=2001475650589
> >WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela=
> 2295 p1=1413697536
> p2=1 p3=0
> >....
> 
> Boris, "SQL*Net message..." events are
> "between-call" events. Their
> times are not included in the following dbcall's
> elapsed time. But it
> *is* appropriate to "blame" the dbcall that follows
> for the time
> consumed by the event. That is, if you can eliminate
> the dbcall that
> follows, then you can eliminate the between-call
> event (and its elapsed
> time). The "assignment of blame" is what "forward
> attribution" is about.
> 
> 
> Cary Millsap
> Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
> http://www.hotsos.com
> 
> Upcoming events:
> - Performance Diagnosis 101: 1/27 Atlanta
> - SQL Optimization 101: 2/16 Dallas
> - Hotsos Symposium 2004: March 7-10 Dallas
> - Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Boris Dali
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 9:39 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> 
> I don't have the book with me right now, but I am
> obviously missing something in the "forward
> attribution" concept as it doesn't seem to help me
> in
> explanation of the following lines:
> 
> .... 
> WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1
> p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
> WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 692
> p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
> WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1
> p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
> FETCH
>
#31:c=0,e=261,p=0,cr=7,cu=0,mis=0,r=4,dep=0,og=4,tim=2001475650589
> WAIT #31: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela=
> 2295
> p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
> ....
> 
> Shouldn't 1 + 692 + 1 (and possibly + 2295 ???) be
> less than 261?
>  
> Oracle 9.2.0.4.0 on HP-UX 11.11
> 
> Thanks,
> Boris Dali.
> 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.net
> -- 
> Author: Boris Dali
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051
> http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web
> hosting services
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
> E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
> 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
> from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information
> (like subscribing).
> 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.net
> -- 
> Author: Cary Millsap
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051
> http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web
> hosting services
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
> E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
> 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
> from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information
> (like subscribing). 

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Boris Dali
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to