Title: Message
I must disagree . . .  this resource is worth MUCH more than the minimal effort it took :-)
 
But if it clears out the dead subscribers,
perhaps we should list addresses every 6 months ;-)
 
Babette Turner-Underwood
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
954-3752 (Mon - Fri 7am - 3pm)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2004-01-28 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: !!Please Read - Oracle-L is moving!!

may i just say - this resource is worth the minimal effort it took
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:09 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: !!Please Read - Oracle-L is moving!!


You sir, have obviously never done this.

I have.  :)

Nor read my first post on the matter.

No, it would not be easier, not by a long shot.

This is free service, so my thinking is, share the workload.

Jared




<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 01/27/2004 11:49 PM
 Please respond to ORACLE-L

       
        To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc:        
        Subject:        RE: !!Please Read - Oracle-L is moving!!



Hi List Manger-
Couldn't a immigration of our subscribed accounts been the most logical and error free option ?
All this fire would have been avaoided.
 
CSW Simon.

Reply via email to