Hi, On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:11 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 14:44 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I might just be suffering from coffee deficiency but shouldn't the copy > > of sequences and arrays be walking the sequence/array members? > > > > > > Thanks, > > jules > > > > > > > > Index: corba-any.c > > =================================================================== > > --- corba-any.c (revision 2040) > > +++ corba-any.c (working copy) > > @@ -934,13 +934,13 @@ > > pval1 = ((CORBA_Principal *)*val)->_buffer; > > > > for (i = 0; i < ((CORBA_Principal *)*newval)->_length; i++) > > - ORBit_copy_value_core (&pval1, &pval2, tc->subtypes > > [0]); > > + ORBit_copy_value_core (&pval1[i], &pval2[i], > > tc->subtypes [0]); > > AFAICT ORBit_copy_value_core() increments both 'pval' and 'pval2' by > sizeof(CORBA_type), so subsequent call operates on next array element. > Additionally, compiler would index _bytes_ here, not _types_.
You are probably right, but I must admit that I do not fully understand this part of the source. I just need some time I'm sure... Thanks, jules _______________________________________________ orbit-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list
