Hi Michael, On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:32 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:36 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: > > You are probably right, but I must admit that I do not fully > > understand this part of the source. I just need some time I'm sure... > > The 'any' code is full of this rather interesting iteration pattern, > and packed full of fun indirection. OTOH - it turns out that is the best > way to have the least code that is the most flexible & re-usable.
Thought so ;-) It would be nice if the working of it was documented in the code. If you ever get hit by a rampaging asteroid or just goes MIA then this "interesting" code would risk being non-maintained as most developers would just turn away after one glance. In a prefect world all code is obvious by first (or second glance) without any need for comments, but in this case I'm sure a few helping words would go a long way towards making it easier for newcomers to help maintaining. Best regards, jules _______________________________________________ orbit-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list
