@Alessandro: Ah, very nice! To me, this syntax actually makes more sense. :) But regardless, it also seems more flexible. For example, I think this should be possible, right?
SELECT expand(out('haveMonth')[month=3].out('haveDay')[day=20].out('haveHour')[hour>=10 and hour<=20].out('haveLogs')) FROM Year WHERE year = "2012" I plan to run some tests, but in the mean time, any thoughts on performance of this approach vs. the other? --Eric On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:29 AM, <alessandrorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > the query would be something like : > > SELECT > expand(out('haveMonth')[month=3].out('haveDay')[day=20].out('haveHour')[hour=10].out('haveLogs')) > FROM Year WHERE year = "2012" > > Regards, > Alessandro > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/orient-database/s7DO-_gygh0/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > orient-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to orient-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.